28527 members and growing – the largest networking group in the maritime industry!

LoginJoin

Saturday, August 18, 2018

Maritime Logistics Professional

Galley Grease Harms Equipment and the Environment

Posted to Galley Grease Harms Equipment and the Environment (by on April 5, 2016

Disposal costs of galley grease can skyrocket, even when sophisticated grease traps are present

Cleaning up the wastewater stream in ships isn’t just about removing hydrocarbons out of oily separators and bilges. Ship galleys harbor a tremendous amount of FOGs (fats, oils and grease) that, if not properly disposed of, can be a health risk, damage equipment and add to overall operational costs.

Even if ships are equipped with sophisticated grease trap systems, the introduction of non-toxic, neutral pH biologic compounds into the trap and/or waste stream is a necessary step to reduce toxic build-up and environmental pollution.

The point is without pre-treating the “junk” where it accumulates – and continuing to treat it regularly –you actually never really get rid of it. Let’s look, for example, at a typical grease trap issue.

Cruise ship restaurants and galleys deal with FOGs on a daily basis. Food grease gets washed down the sink, ground up in the disposal, and ends up in the grease trap. A grease trap is typically a holding tank that separates FOGs from the galley’s drain prior to moving to the gray water holding tank. The solids will naturally build up at the bottom of the trap. But grease and oil will always float to the top of the water, making the water murky. This waste has to be disposed of.

Aboard ships, the waste stream from the galley gray water holding tanks, depending on regulations related to ship size, waters they are traversing, etc., is held for pump out at a port facility or may be pumped overboard. This relocates the “problem” and transfers responsibility to someone else to deal with; this is both costly and time consuming. Pump out at the port facility is expensive, and discharge into the ocean is nothing but “permitted” pollution.

We did the same with plastic over the years and have huge floating gyres (floating plastic debris fields) to try to figure out how to clean up. These gyres affect our food supply and needlessly kill and mutate ocean creatures. So wouldn’t it stand to reason that FOGs, detergents, and cleaning chemicals – even if they are touted as phosphate free or readily biodegradable – will have a negative impact as well? 

This is where the science of bioremediation plays a big role. Bioremediation is nothing new. It has been around for centuries and has been studied more extensively, since the 1940s. It’s been used with success in several industrial industries, but its adoption into the maritime industry remains slow.

Why? Because people haven’t been educated on how to compare the mainstream “green” cleaning and cleaner/degreaser products they use now and the ones that actually stop toxic build up and have no toxic compounds in them.

Bioremediation is the process of using naturally occurring, safe and beneficial micro-organisms to degrade environmentally harmful contaminants and turn them into non-toxic compounds. In particular, these organisms will break down petroleum hydrocarbons and transform them into carbon dioxide (CO2) and water. Further, this natural process will produce valuable bio-nutrients that can be utilized by both plant and aquatic life.

According to a study carried out at the student center of the Texas Christian University by the Environmental Science Department entitled “Comparison of Four Treatment Methods for the Removal of Lipids and Food Waste in a Grease Trap Environment”, the use of bioremediation made a significant difference in the amount of FOGs.

The study compared pumping the trap, bacterial inoculation (introducing bioremedial microbes), aeration, and a combination of aeration and inoculation over a several-month period at the University’s cafeteria. The paper states that “when microorganisms are exposed to contaminants over a period of time, they tend to mutate (due to their rapid cell division) to a strain of microorganism that is capable of utilizing the contaminant as an energy source.”

In lay terms, that means that using non-toxic and non-caustic bioremedial products introduces bacterial microbes that love to “eat” grease. These grease-eating microbes start to break down the FOGs, and over time, continually eat them, reducing the amount of “junk” to deal with in the disposal stage.

Any food establishment, whether on land or at sea, is increasingly having to keep up with stringent environmental regulations for dealing with grease and hydrocarbons. The standards are getting more complex by the day.

That’s why pre-treating the waste water is essential before it goes any farther. In fact, the paper also states: “While frequent pump-outs of the trap can greatly reduce the odor and clogging problems, there is still the problem of disposing the accumulated waste contents (oil, grease, settled food particles, and gray water) of the trap… The process of breaking a compound down to CO2 and H20 is very complex, and can only be accomplished by a living organism through many metabolic steps (Grubbs, 1991).”

The study concluded that “Even with the slower-working anaerobic bacteria in treatment II there was still a significant removal rate that was comparable to having a grease trap pumped every two weeks.” And that “…results illustrate the fact that there is sufficient retention time in the grease trap environment for bioremediation to be effective when the trap environment is augmented using aeration and specific bacteria. …This therefore decreases energy usage and costs to the treatment plant and increases the life of the treatment facility.” Aeration may be accomplished via the natural water flow moving through the galley/kitchen drainage system, thus not requiring any additional mechanical insertion of aeration capability.

In another study, a non-toxic, non-caustic bioremediation product called GTO was introduced. Developed for the food processing and manufacturing industries by EnviroLogics BioBased Technologies, Inc., (Environmental Solution is a Master Distributor and representative), the product digests the great, fats and organic wastes that accumulate in the grease traps and drain lines.

GTO was
introduced to see if the waste system could work more efficiently at breaking down FOGs and reduce the monthly disposal costs.

Here are the totals when the study began (BOD: biochemical oxygen demand; TSS: total suspended solids):

BEFORE

BOD

2328mg/L

TSS

2660mg/L

Surcharge

$1029.46.


IN LESS THAN 30 DAYS, THE NUMBERS DROPPED TO:

BOD

1086mg/L

TSS

568mg/L

Surcharge

$376.41


By the end of the study period, the BOD level was no surcharges incurred. All this meant a significant bottom line savings.

From my observations, maritime problem solvers tend to focus on adding another mechanical device to manage these situations. This requires additional space, engineering solutions, power requirements, etc.  The Vessel General Permit and other regulations “require” detergents that are phosphate free and degreasers that are rapidly biodegradable, etc. These are NOT standards.  Standards should be based on toxicity to the aquatic environment. 

The only part of the cleaning detergents that is readily biodegradable is the cleaning solution itself; the result is the chemicals are biodegraded, but the FOG, bacteria, etc., they removed or cleaned, still remain. That’s why it’s imperative to constantly clean and maintain grease traps with the right cleaning solution so they can function as they’re designed.

We have done little to tax the chemical industry to develop cleaning products that fit our definition rather than theirs. The technology to develop cleaners, degreasers, etc., does exist to manufacture non-toxic, non-corrosive, and non-caustic solutions for areas such as bilges and galleys. The Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquatic Science (Cefas) based in the U.K., has demonstrated this in the North Sea. These products will compliment and reduce the strain on existing systems, thus allowing installed mechanical systems to have a longer service life.

The maritime community needs to take the initiative to develop acceptable aquatic toxicity standards and drive industry to meet those standards. Bioremedial products are not an end-all, but rather compliment existing technology, will extend the useful service life of existing systems and will save money in disposal costs.   

Op-Ed published in Marine News, March 2016 edition.

***********************************************************************************************************
Preserve your valuable assets! Want more information on how proven, safe and non-toxic bioremediation products can help your maritime business save time and money? Contact John at john@totalbiosolution.com or 919-740-0546. Review our EPA-approved product line and sign up for our educational newsletter here.

Tags: FOGs galley grease grease traps galley equipment grease disposal costs bioremediation