President & CEO, Chamber of Shipping of America
Eventually, she was elevated to the position of Manager, State Government Affairs for Sun’s Midwest operations area. In this capacity, she was responsible for the design and implementation of a proactive government relations strategy including interface with state legislatures and regulatory agencies, communications with diverse business lines including refining and marketing, terminals and pipelines and interaction with Sun’s federal government affairs professionals.
In 1997, she joined the Chamber of Shipping of America as Director of Maritime Affairs for the Chamber of Shipping of America (CSA); the primary maritime trade association representing U.S. based commercial shipping interests in international, federal and state forums. She has testified before Congressional committees, federal and state regulatory agencies and has attended numerous sessions of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) initially as the American shipowner representative on the U.S. delegation to the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) and the Maritime Safety Committee and currently as the American shipowner representative on the International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) delegation.
She took the reins as President & CEO of CSA in January 2015. Metcalf has been with CSA for almost 20 years and brings a solid background of seagoing service and shore responsibilities with shipping companies that serve CSA’s membership well. She weighs in on a host of issues facing today’s shipping and logistics community.
Summarize 2017 for shipping companies: the good, the bad and the ugly. And, at the same time, tell us what’s looming large in the porthole for 2018.
2017 has been a year of mixed outcomes. Internationally and domestically, the shipping industry is in a multiple year
CSA has been involved with the ballast water treatment & invasive species question since the very beginning. With the IMO backing off its timelines, and the Coast Guard holding firm (on theirs), what will your advice now be for your
My advice has not changed much in light of the Convention entering into force September 2017 and the USCG program going full speed ahead. The most important consideration is to determine the implementation date for a given vessel. Assuming a shipowner has done nothing to identify a suitable system, the next step is to identify the operational needs of the vessel as well as its design. Shipowners on a per vessel basis need to look at needed flow rates, footprints of the various systems, typical transits to assure sufficient transit time to meet the holding time requirements of a particular system, power requirements, installation and maintenance feasibility, sampling and monitoring requirements, and chemical handling and storage requirements to name a few. Narrowing down systems suitable to a particular vessel configuration is the most important first step. The next step is to determine if a particular system has a type approval, whether it is issued by the United States or another country. If it does not have a US type approval, it is critically important for the shipowner to determine if the manufacturer is engaged in seeking a US type approval. If not, cross that system off your list.
Taking all of the above into consideration, it’s time to engage in negotiations with manufacturers that produce systems that meet the operational needs of the vessel in question. These negotiations obviously will include price, but equally as important should include discussions on
A well-informed colleague, Debra DiCianna from Choice Ballast Solutions has put together a simple list of generic considerations and advice. In her words, vessel owners should (1) expect the unexpected (2) develop a compliance strategy including considerations for system design and installation and contingency planning (3) document all discussions with system manufacturers, engineering firms and drydocks including any operational issues noted (4) keep up to date with all developments and (5) team with trusted partners.
CSA Advocacy extends to foreign flag and domestic operators and membership. What is the common glue that holds this unique group together and what one issue – if you can distill it down to that – do they share that concerns all of them?
The primary goal of our members is to assure that they are compliant with all legal requirements in all locations to which they trade. As a
CSA in Action: If you had to choose one mission of your many daily tasks, where do you provide the most value for your membership? Why, how and can you give us specific examples?
CSA’s goal is to ensure that our members know what they have to do to remain compliant today, and what they may have to do in the future. With the avalanche of new requirements both internationally and here in the US, it is critical that they have the necessary information to make informed business decisions. For us to be successful in this mission requires CSA to be at the forefront of all discussions relating to international deliberations (IMO) and U.S. state legislative and regulatory initiatives. CSA staff work very hard at maintaining the critical network and interfaces with Congress, USCG, EPA, NOAA and the State Department. In this role, our primary aim is to be seen as a trusted industry advisor capable of providing the industry perspective on any initiatives which may impact the US maritime industry. Specific examples of this type of work include providing testimony at key Congressional hearings, participating in the US rulemaking process by providing written and oral comments and participating in IMO deliberations as a member of the International Chamber of Shipping delegation.
The 2020 global sulfur cap: You are keenly aware of the pressures facing your membership as they make difficult environmental decisions in an equally challenging charter market. That said, most of the overt pressure seems to be exerted on the shipping
The first principal in meeting the challenges of the 2020 global sulfur cap is the recognition that information is everything. CSA has been involved in these discussions since their inception and provided regular briefings to our members as the issue further develops. While the ship is the point of compliance, discussions particularly those at IMO, have attempted to bring this issue to the forefront through discussions with bunker providers and refiners. CSA has analyzed studies relating to fuel availability and provided opinions on the conclusions reached in these studies. While the 2020 sulfur cap is a non-issue for vessels engaged in the domestic trade since they already have to comply with the 0.1% sulfur fuel required in the North American and Caribbean Emission Control Areas, vessels engaged in international trade, regardless of flag, will need to make smart business decisions on how to comply with the 2020 cap. CSA has briefed its members on three specific paths to compliance – use of alternative fuels, installation of scrubbers or use of 0.5% global cap compliant fuel, taking into account the respective costs associated with each of the three compliance strategies. My advice to shipowners
Safety: it is a big part of your organization, you give out awards annually for those high performers who ‘walk the walk’ and ‘talk the talk.’ Beyond the awards, though, where does CSA get involved in that important area?
Safety and environmental performance are two of the biggest performance indicators for CSA and its member companies. In order to assist our members, we stay involved in discussions relating to best practices and areas for improvement as well as regulatory initiatives at the international and domestic levels. Our members have safety management and environmental management systems which are continually under review with an aim toward progressive improvement, whether required by regulation or not.
Focus: When it comes to CSA, what keeps you up at night, why, and what are you doing about it?
(As published in the November/December 2017 edition of Maritime Logistics Professional)